|
Adrien Le Corbeau, The Forest
Giant
translated from the
French
by T. E. Lawrence
Chapter 4 : Contrasts
which are not Contrasts
On the earth it was
spring: and the excitement of it drove underground. Our sprouting seed
was caught up in this frenzy of living, expanded itself, and pushed
downwards and upwards in a double movement, under cover of that odd
buckler, the pileorhiza. The light attracted it; but at the same time it
plunged deeper into the night, for there it found hidden sympathies, and
encouragements which made it fierce and greedy. It grew enormously,
draining to itself the scattered nourishment about it. If other
existences were starved thereby, so much the worse for them.
Not long ago our plant was a humble seed, ready to beg its tiny life
from each powerful menacing blade of grass. To-day it was a successful
bully, drinking up all the ichor of its patch of soil: and such conduct
is the general rule, even with us men. When we are weak and know it, we
are timid crawling things, hating all powers since they seem directed
against us: but let us gain a little strength, and we grow
proportionately rude, beating down the weaker. So true is it that
evolution in nature is only a re-direction of energy. The Eye which
controls the universe really seems to have foreseen and planned
everything; and things which appear unjust or horrible to us may appear
so only because we do not know the full logic of their existence.
It is pleasant to imagine what happens deep down in that secret mansion
of the lower earth. The press of life can be no less there than on the
face of the ground. Yet we call it a mystery, and rank it with all that
is beyond our sense, with that class of event which even our
imaginations fail to visualise precisely. If only we could see the
sequoia root with our eyes, or had some yet unexpressed means with which
to analyse or share its likes and dislikes, watch its battles, follow
its sorrows, its joys! Why were we not endowed with some special sense
able to feel the satisfied tremor of the growing root when it made
contact with kindly elements in the blank night?
From some distance, somewhere deep under the ground, a trickle of water
sent it refreshing vibrations, like a call. How did our plant discover
the presence of this distant and friendly liquid? Did it experience that
familiar feeling of cool freshness which we men have near water, which
we would have felt in its place? Yet the plant had no skin like ours,
nor nerves, nor sense of smell. It is a mystery how it should have known
things, and how it guessed where lay the foodstuffs it needed, and by
what resources beyond our knowledge it perceived their existence. It
never missed its aim, though it had to reach out, twist, even ramify, to
get at these food-elements, and absorb them. In nature there are
hundreds of such instincts, and senses, and faculties, besides the
feelings, or nerves, or other appurtenances of the flesh of which we are
made. In life there are thousands of unknown energies, of secret
perceptions, of indescribable vibrations, which we never feel, and shall
never know while we are what we are….
Yes, outside it was spring-time. Its light and heat bathed all the
surface of the ground, instilling into the under-soil a whole range of
influences to affect some of the thousands of embryos which there come
to life, by stages which we cannot follow, and of most of which we never
become aware. Creation is so leisurely and so retiring that it makes
little impression on us. It is destruction which is the striking thing,
because it is quick and clear and violent. An instant destroys a thing
which we have long seen living and developing. A tree many hundreds of
years old is crashed down in a minute by lightning; in a few days a
forest fire will destroy a forest which has existed for thousands of
years; and this wanton annihilation instils in us a great terror,
together with an unintelligent belief in the goddess of destruction,
that savage and formidable power which seems to rule the world, and
fills us with devout awe: she seems so mighty and so bold and ruthless
that we think her the sole goddess of life.
Such an idea comes to us because of the limited range of our knowledge
and perceptions, our only criteria of judgement. In such conditions
naturally it is the visible and tangible world which makes most effect
on us. Yet we should remind ourselves that if a being under our eyes
passes in a second from life to death, yet in that same instant millions
of similar beings are being created by the mysterious courses of organic
nature: just as while lightning is striking and consuming a giant of the
forest in one burning moment, simultaneously millions of such trees are
germinating in the fruitful heat of mother-earth, beyond our sphere of
control. We should note that in all ways and at all times creation has
the numerical superiority over destruction, whether it concerns men or
animals or plants. In truth we have no reason to complain that our
senses have been reduced to such bare limits. How palpitant life would
be for us if new faculties superadded to our old gave us to see the
invisible, to understand the occult, to apprehend like plants, to feel
in vibrations like light, to flow abroad like seas and contemplate the
bounds of space.
Let it be enough if we record, without seeking to explain it by finding
a parallel in our equipment, how singularly efficient our plant was in
insinuating its roots where it would. With the aid of its pileorhiza it
passed not merely through crumbling soil, but through stony strata,
plaster, and wood. Another mystery, this, how so soft a substance could
penetrate hard bodies, which we burst through only by means of a great
effort of strength, using tools yet harder. The sequoia root, dipping
downward in one direction, thrusting upward in another, without external
aid split obstacles against which we have to employ iron and stone: and
at last one fine morning its first shoot pierced the top layer of soil
to salute the sun.
At this second the plant was, to our eyes, at last born. We commonly
pass over its hardest battles, those conditioned by the circumstances of
its origin. In reality it was while yet beneath the ground that the
little sequoia tree experienced the mother-care of those kindly shades
without which it could not have come to life: but few of us take note of
that. We so commonly put the effect before the cause and the success
before the effort. Yet our little plant went down as much as it went up,
with roots very like its crests, though the one struck upward towards
the sun, and the other struck downward through the night.
I would say that this inexplicable symmetry is one of the laws which
govern the seen, and probably also the unseen, world. Ideas, beings,
things, phenomena of all kinds exhibit to us much the same beginnings,
similar developments, and parallel endings. This fact we can grasp only
piecemeal, not in its whole; but it is clear that always there is an
analogy between extremes. We know that plant-roots are like their heads.
Dawn and twilight (opposed limits of a natural event) are like one
another: the same pallid colours, the same freshness, the same effect of
unambitious calm. Sunrise and sunset, respectively the appearance and
the disappearance of our day-star, glare at us with a like extravagance
of noisy red. Old age and childhood, the two poles of human life,
resemble one another in their feebleness and weak vitality. Our great
joys are silent as our great sorrows; and the ecstasy of love is not far
from the frenzy of hate. Nature is re-born in spring-tide, and falls
sadly asleep when autumn closes: and yet these two seasons are very like
- showers of rain and gusty winds, shot across with the same weak rays
of yellow light.
We find this odd likeness of contrasts not merely in
visible nature and in life, but also in the most subtle abstractions of
the spiritual world. We expect a great happiness as anxiously as a great
misfortune, and when we do things our first conception, and the memory
which follows it, trace in our minds the same sort of hazy contour in
fleeting neutral tint. The nescience of our birth is like our death's.
Oh! we know very well
how some of these resemblances are caused - thanks
to the action of the simple laws of physical nature - but our spirit
fails when we ask why these analogies should appear with so strange and
universal a regularity.
  
|
|