|
T. E. Lawrence to Frederic Manning
Mount Batten,
Plymouth
15.V.30
Dear Manning,
That would have been a pleasant letter to get, for the tallest
author alive: and therefore many times pleasanter for me, who think
myself no great shakes at writing, from one whose writing I so vainly
admire. Your prose has a very definite and deliberate manner, which
appeals to me, as most 'airs' do. Your poems have helped you to that
concision and force. The best of poetry is all the clauses it leaves
out, and that is why poets so often write such tough and nervy prose
- or so I fancy.
Your remarks hit off very closely the obstacles that attended the
delivery of The Seven Pillars. I was a rather clumsy novice at
writing, facing what I felt to be a huge subject with hanging over me
the political uncertainty of the Arab movement. We had promised them
so much, and at the end wanted to give them so little. So for two
years there was a dog fight, up and down the dirty passages of Downing
St., and then all came out right - only the book was finished. It might
have been happier, had I foreseen the clean ending. I wrote it in some
stress and misery of mind.
The second complicity was my own moral standing. I had been so much
of a free agent, repeatedly deciding what I (and others) should do:
and I wasn't sure if my opportunity (or reality, as I called it) was
really justified. Not morally justifiable. I could see it wasn't: but
justified by the standard of Lombard St. and Pall Mall. By putting
all the troubles and dilemmas on paper, I hoped to work out my path
again, and satisfy myself how wrong, or how right, I had been.
So the book is the self-argument of a man who couldn't then see
straight: and who now thinks that perhaps it did not matter: that
seeing straight is only an illusion. We do these things in sheer
vapidity of mind, not deliberately, not consciously even. To make out
that we were reasoned cool minds, ruling our courses and
contemporaries, is a vanity. Things happen, and we do our best to keep
in the saddle.
After the Arab business I rather foreswore saddles. The R.A.F.
is a socket in which I fit safely: after many tribulations, as you
will discover if P.D. lets you read my Mint which describes how the
Air Force rounds off its pegs to fit into their holes. Now-a-days my
mind does not concern itself greatly with abstractions. Hence the red
face and round belly and comfortable port. I think I am happier than
most people.
What you say about the descriptive stuff slowing down the narrative
pleases me, rather. I had suspected it. Descriptions shouldn't be more
than a line or two. Only I was not really out to make a masterpiece
(-or was I? I think I wanted to, and felt that I could not, and had
not) and the sense of the country and atmosphere and climate and
furniture of Arabia hung so tightly about me that I put too much of
them into the story, in hopes that they would make it life-like. I
wake up now, often, in Arabia: the place has stayed with me much more
than the men and the deeds. Whenever a landscape or colour in England
gets into me deeply, more often than not it is because something of it
recalls Arabia. It was a tremendous country and I cared for it far
more than I admired my role as a man of action. More acting than
action, I fancy, there.
Your seeing Jahveh and the Baalim is of course what I was trying to
convey. My two years taught me the inwardness of all Semitic history,
from its beginning: and that includes Zeno and other unexpected
persons. As for my harnessing to my go-cart the eternal force - well,
no: I pushed my go-cart into the eternal stream, and so it went faster
than the ones that are pushed cross-stream or up-stream. I did not
believe finally in the Arab movement: but thought it necessary, in its
time and place. It has justified itself hugely, since the war, too.
So, even to a political or statesman, the conflict is measurable and
significant. I am still puzzled as to how far the individual counts: a
lot, I fancy, if he pushes the right way.
Joyce and his party try to 'present objects to the vision simply by
enumerating' not all, indeed, but a careful selection of their
qualities. I was at least as selective as Joyce, in intention. Only
perhaps I didn't see, precisely enough, what was significant. I'm
sorry about 'dolerite' and 'striated'... but these seemed easy
enough, after one had thought of them. I tried not to be technical,
unnecessarily.
'Slowing down the dramatic action' Yes: as I hinted, much of the
dramatic action was very reluctantly put in. It felt cheap, then, and
looks cheap now. I preferred Arabia when I wasn't in it, so to speak!
I'm so glad you didn't tear the letter up: because it has given me
a great deal of innocent pleasure... or is the pleasure that would be
vanity, if the recipient believed it earned, innocent?...
The first draft was not destroyed by me, but stolen from me; left
behind in the refreshment room of Reading Station, and taken by some
unknown! It was shorter, snappier, and more truthful than the present
version, which was done from memory. I do not think it was franker and
angrier, for I do not get angry much, and 1920 (the date of this text,
in the main) was a worse year for me than 1919, the date of the first
draft. My compromise with fate you will see happening gradually in
1922-23, as I settled into the R.A.F.; if you read The Mint. Here is
the chronology:
1914-1918: the War
1919: Peace Conference: misery 1920-1921 (Aug): Dog fight in London with the
British Government 1922: Eighteen months work with Winston
Churchill settling the Middle East
after my lights. 1922 (Aug)-193O: R.A.F.
It is exceedingly good of you to have taken all that trouble.
T.E.S.

|
|