|
T. E. Lawrence to Lionel Curtis
[Bovington Camp] 19.3.23
Lorde,
My mind moves me this morning to write you a whole series of
letters, to be more splendid than the Lettres de Mon Moulin. Nothing
will come of it, but meanwhile this page grows blacker with the
preliminaries.
What should the preliminaries be? A telling why I joined? As you
know I don't know! Explaining it to Dawnay I said 'Mind-suicide': but
that's only because I'm an incorrigible phraser. Do you, in reading my
complete works, notice that tendency to do up small packets of words
foppishly? At the same time there's the reason why I have twice enlisted, in
those same complete works: on my last night in Barton Street I read
chapters 113 to 118, and saw implicit in them my late course. The
months of politics with Winston were abnormal, and the R.A.F. and Army
are natural. The Army (which I despise with all my mind) is more
natural than the R.A.F.: for at Farnborough I grew suddenly on fire
with the glory which the air should be, and set to work full steam to
make the others vibrate to it like myself. I was winning too, when
they chucked me out: indeed I rather suspect I was chucked out for
that. It hurt the upper story that the ground-floor was grown too
keen. The Army seems safe against enthusiasm. It's a horrible life, and
the other fellows fit it. I said to one 'They're the sort who instinctively fling stones at cats'... and he said 'Why what do you throw?'
You perceive that I'm not yet in the picture: but I will be in time.
Seven years of this will make me impossible for anyone to suggest for
a responsible position, and that self-degradation is my aim. I haven't
the impulse and the conviction to fit what I know to be my power of
moulding men and things: and so I always regret what I've created,
when the leisure after creation lets me look back and see that the
idea was secondhand.
This is a pompous start, and it should be a portentous series of
letters: but there is excuse for it, since time moves slower here than
elsewhere: and a man has only himself to think about. At reveille I
feel like Adam, after a night's pondering: and my mind has malice
enough rather to enjoy putting Adam through it.
Don't take seriously what I wrote about the other men, above. It's
only at first that certain sides of them strike a little crudely. In
time I'll join, concerning them, in Blake's astonishing cry
'Everything that is, is holy!' It seems to me one of the best words
ever said. Philip Kerr would agree with it (one of the engaging things
about Philip is his agreement with my absence), but not many other
reflective men come to the same conclusion without a web of mysticism
to help them. I'm not sure either that what I've said about my creations is quite
true. I feel confident that Arabia and Trans-Jordan and Mesopotamia, with what they will breed, are nearly monumental enough for the seven
years' labour of one head: because I knew what I was at, and the
others only worked on instinct: and my other creation, that odd and
interminable book... do you know I'm absolutely hungry to know what
people think of it - not when they are telling me, but what they tell
to one another. Should I be in this secret case if I really thought it
pernicious? There again, perhaps there's a solution to be found in multiple
personality. It's my reason which condemns the book and the revolt, and
the new nationalities: because the only rational conclusion to human
argument is pessimism such as Hardy's, a pessimism which is very much
like the wintry heath, of bog and withered plants and stripped trees,
about us. Our camp on its swelling in this desolation feels pustular,
and we (all brown-bodied, with yellow spots down our front
belly-line), must seem like the swarming germs of its fermentation.
That's feeling, exterior-bred feeling, with reason harmonising it into
a picture: but there's a deeper sense which remembers other landscapes, and the changes which summer will bring to this one: and to that
sense nothing can be changeless: whereas the rational preference or
advantage of pessimism is its finality, the eternity in which it ends:
and if there isn't an eternity there cannot be a pessimism pure. Lorde what a fog of words! What I would say is that reason proves
there is no hope, and we therefore hope on, so to speak, on one leg of
our minds: a dot and go one progress, which takes me Tuesday Thursday
and Saturday and leaves me authentic on the other days. Quelle vie. R. Note.
Next letter in this
series 27 March > 
|